Saturday, September 13, 2008

Best Comments of the Olympics

And the gold medal for commentators and interview goes to.......................

10. Weightlifting commentator: 'This is Gregorieva from Bulgaria . I saw her snatch this morning during her warm up and it was amazing.'

9. Dressage commentator: 'This is really a lovely horse and I speak from personal experience since I once mounted her mother.'

8. Paul Hamm, Gymnast: 'I owe a lot to my parents, especially my mother and father.'

7. Boxing Analyst: 'Sure there have been injuries, and even some deaths in boxing, but none of them really that serious.'

6. Softball announcer: 'If history repeats itself, I should think we can expect the same thing again.'

5. Basketball analyst: 'He dribbles a lot and the opposition doesn't like it. In fact you can see it all over their faces.'

4. At the rowing medal ceremony: 'Ah, isn't that nice, the wife of the IOC president is hugging the cox of the British crew.'

3. Soccer commentator: 'Julian Dicks is everywhere. It's like they've got eleven Dicks on the field.'

2. Tennis commentator: 'One of the reasons Andy is playing so well is that, before the final round, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them... Oh my God, what have I just said?'

1) Sally McClellan with a silver in the 100 hurdles gave a GOLD standard interview. The best interview of the Olympics completely!

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Anniversary -- observed.



So...you would have thought that Kris could have just told me all that mushy stuff, instead of publishing it for the world to see, and me having to read it online. Sheesh!

Anyway, for our anniversary...um, well, I actually skipped hockey practice (which is a good start, right?) and we went out for dinner at a pretty decent place nearby called the Mussel Bar. Oddly enough, the folks at the table next to us were celebrating their anniversary also -- their 6th. This year it became apparent that we've been married longer than many of our (often much older) friends and acquaintances. It's, um, kind of weird.

So this year was all about the finer things -- art, wine, tractors.
As a surprise to me, Kris had one of my favorite pictures blown up (as in, "enlarged") and framed, and I made a frame for a silk-screened canvas from Terri and hung that. Neither of us knew what the other had planned, it was just a reaction to spending all this time in a house with bare walls. We also got a pretty cool print of a photo of a monk's hands during olive harvest.

Yes, a monk.

See, we went away this weekend to Australia's only monastic town. That's right, nothing screams romantic getaway like the Benedictines. It's a pretty cool town, 162 years old with some serious architecture -- and some not-so-serious. We came around the corner of a century-old building to find a series of open-air chambers. Three walls, no roofs. And built that way, not all tumble-down. Any guesses? Check below to see if you're right.

Speaking of not-so serious, the guidepost to the monastery seems to point at a row of corrugated iron sheds. Of course, we are in Australia, and it would be unthinkable for the monastery to depart from local accepted architectural practices. Right?

Also on this tour, only an hour from Perth, we went to a few wineries. I don't know about all of you, but there is only so much wine-tasting I can do, but these folks have figured out that if you also have olive oil and homemade bread at most of the cellar doors, you don't get taste bud fatigue, and you sell olive oil! And Dukkah! Mmmm. So, we finally filled up our wine rack. Something like 20 bottles of wine, and one bottle of port. And some Dukkah, of course.

Like a mobile cellar, we drove out to the coast to explore the towns of Lancelin and Guilderton, and found them to be very nice seaside towns, thank you very much. And we learned about one more use for an International Tractor that had never occured to me before. (Notice the boat trailer?)

So that was a pretty good trip. Now we've got some art on the wall and wine in the rack, ready for visitors. C'mon Down!

(Handball courts! Really! They even have an historical plaque.)

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

12 year anniversary explained as genetic anomoly...

Health News

'Bonding Gene' Could Help Men Stay Married

One form of DNA linked to marital bliss, the other to discord, study found

By E.J. Mundell
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Sept. 1 (HealthDay News) -- Whether a man has one type of gene versus another could help decide whether he's good "husband material," a new study suggests.

A study of Swedish twin brothers found that differences in a gene modulating the hormone vasopressin were strongly tied to how well each man fared in marriage.

"Our main finding was an association between a variant of the vasopressin receptor 1a gene and how strong bonds men reported they had to their partners," said lead researcher Hasse Walum, of the department of medical epidemiology and biostatistics at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. "Men carrying this variant scored on average lower on a scale measuring the strength of the bond compared to men not carrying this variant."

Women married to men carrying the "poorer bonding" form of the gene also reported "lower scores on levels of marital quality than women married to men not carrying this variant," Walum noted.

His team published its findings in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.

Walum's team first got interested in the role of vasopressin and bonding among males when studying a rodent, the vole. "Studies in voles have shown that the hormone vasopressin is released in the brain of males during mating," Walum explained.

Vasopressin activates the brain's reward system, and "you could say that mating-induced vasopressin release motivates male voles to interact with females they have mated with," Walum said. "This is not a sexual motivation, but rather a sort of prolonged social motivation." In other words, the more vasopressin in the brain, the more male voles want to stick around and mingle with the female after copulation is through. This effect "is more pronounced in the monogamous voles," Walum noted.

But voles and humans are very different species, so would the same effect hold true for men?

To find out, the Swedish team zeroed in the vasopressin 1a gene, which is shared by both species. Variations in this gene strongly influence vasopressin activity in the male vole, so Walum wondered if it might do the same for men.

To find out, his team looked for variants of the vasopressin 1a gene among 552 pairs of male twins enrolled in Sweden's ongoing Twin and Offspring Study. All of the men were currently in a relationship that had lasted at least five years, although about 18 percent of the men remained unmarried. The men were subjected to psychological tests assessing their ability to bond and commit, and the researchers also interviewed the men's spouses when possible.

They found that men with a certain variant, known as an allele, of the vasopressin 1a gene, called 334, tended to score especially low on a standard psychological test called the Partner Bonding Scale. They were also less likely to be married than men carrying another form of the gene. And carrying two copies of the 334 allele doubled the odds that the men had undergone some sort of marital crisis (for example, the threat of divorce) over the past year.

All of these findings "make sense," said Dr. John Lucas, a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. He said it's well known that genes help drive much of human behavior, including mate bonding.

But the vasopressin 1a gene is likely not the only factor influencing a man's ability to form true and lasting bonds, he added.

"It's unlikely to be a single gene [at work] -- it's likely to be multiple genes that are expressed incompletely and interact with the environment," said Lucas, who is also a psychiatrist at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. He pointed out that what psychologists call "temperament" -- the individual palette of emotions and behaviors that even babies display -- is probably "hard-wired" by our genetics. "But temperament, through training and experience, becomes personality," Lucas said. "And personality is a complicated situation, of course, and it involves the ability to commit."

So, it's too early for men to blame their inability to commit on a single gene, although Lucas guesses it's an excuse that's "certainly going to be used."

For his part, Walum agreed that men and their spouses shouldn't read too much into the finding.

"Taken together, the effect of the gene variant that we have studied on human pair-bonding behavior is rather small, and it can not, with any real accuracy, be used to predict how someone will behave in a future relationship," he said.

Walum also noted that the finding would probably not be applicable to women, since vasopressin appears to be tied to social bonding in males, but not females.

In a related study, also in the same issue of the journal, researchers at the Pacific Health Research Institute in Honolulu said they've identified a gene strongly linked to extended health and life span in humans. The FOXO3A gene, involved in insulin signaling, is just the second gene ever found that is closely tied to longevity, the researchers said. In their study of Japanese-American men, those who lived to an average age of 98 had a specific variant of FOXO3A compared to men who died at younger ages, the team said.

This just in.....

Nathan Mannix found to have record-levels of vasopressin. Wife still takes credit for happy marriage. Scientists believe this a reliable test for genetic "bonding" theory.


KM

12 years--who's counting?

It's pretty amazing...Nathan and I have been married for 12 years.
We've been together for 17 years (Prior to dating me, Nathan's previous longest relationship was 6 weeks, I think).
We are on the cusp of having been together longer than we've not been together. (If you count all those years I was definitely more interested in fighting boys than dating them, we are well past that mark).

Sometimes it still feels like we are honey-mooning. Suddenly, I'll be seized with the incredible urge to hold hands, sing romantic ballads, write love letters. Maybe it has to do with moving countries every 5 years or not having kids, but it seems like our relationship together is still very new. I'm still discovering things about him that I never knew or never would have even guessed.

Othertimes, we know each other so well that we finish each other's thoughts, can tell the cards in our partner's hand and how they'll be played, and tell our jokes in unison. That can mean we know EXACTLY how to to press the other person's buttons too, but we always work hard to fight fair, and find a way to avoid a disagreement next time. We know each other so well that we know matter how difficult a time or situation, we'll get through it together.

It's amazing that after all this time we not only still love each other, we are still in love with each other. I think its because I've married an incredibly intelligent, considerate, romantic, funny, ethical, sexy, loyal, interesting, caring, and basically GOOD person. I know I'm lucky that I found someone so supportive, patient, fun-loving and adventurous, and he chose to be part of my life.

About every 5 years or so, we we get remarried. I guess because in some small way I can't believe Nathan has chosen me for his soulmate, and I want to know he'd chose me again. So, we stand together and say our vows. You are my life, you are my love. To have, hold and cherish from this day forward.

The ceremony is just a symbol of the commitment that shines through in every generous act, every time I'm forgiven for my faults, every lawn mowed or dish washed, every good night kiss.
So ceremony or not, I just want to say.

Nathan, I do. I STILL do.

I love you. Kristin